Blog

The best performing mutual funds in Bangladesh, ranked by actual return

By ReturnKoto? Published Updated

Every fund we track, ranked by annualised total return with dividends reinvested, over a window every fund can fill. Rebuilt from NAV history each day.

These figures update themselves. Every number below is recalculated from NAV history each day, so this page is current as of 24 September 2026 rather than the day it was written.

Search for the best mutual fund in Bangladesh and you will mostly find fund managers describing their own products. That is not a conspiracy, it is just how the market is set up. Nobody has an incentive to publish a table that might place their fund near the bottom.

This is that table.

35 funds over 2 years: VIPB Fixed Income Fund leads at 20.00% a year, the middle fund returned 9.05%, and the lowest 0.34%. 35 of 35 ended higher, and 4 sit in the top eight over both 2 years and 5 years.

Ranked over 2 years

All 35 funds appear here because 2 years is the longest window every one of them has actually been tracked for. Ranking a fund over a period it did not exist for would be inventing history.

Top funds by annualised total return over 2 years, dividends reinvested, through 24 September 2026.
Annualised total return over 2 years, dividends reinvested, NAV history through 24 September 2026. The last column is the same fund's rank over 5 years.
#FundPer year5-yr rank
1VIPB Fixed Income Fund (Income)20.00%too new
2Ekush Stable Return Fund (Income)16.21%too new
3UCB Income Plus Fund (Income)16.09%too new
4EDGE Bangladesh Mutual Fund (Growth) Both15.59%#7
5EDGE AMC Growth Fund (Growth) Both15.46%#8
6Ekush Growth Fund (Growth) Both15.20%#2
7Shanta Fixed Income Fund (Income) Both14.76%#1
8EDGE High Quality Income Fund (Income)14.73%too new
9Ekush First Unit Fund (Balanced)14.46%#5
10IDLC Income Fund (Income)10.93%#3
11IDLC Balanced Fund (Balanced)10.83%#6
12IDLC Growth Fund (Growth)10.02%#15
13BCB ICL Growth Fund (Growth)9.95%#17
14LB Gratuity Opportunities Fund (Balanced)9.74%#9
15LankaBangla 1st Balanced Unit Fund (Balanced)9.58%#22
16VIPB Balanced Fund (Balanced)9.33%#10
17ICL Balanced Fund (Balanced)9.17%#20
18VIPB Growth Fund (Growth)9.05%#12
19CWT Emerging Bangladesh First Growth Fund (Growth)8.92%#4
20VIPB Accelerated Income Unit Fund (Income)8.77%#13
21CWT Sadharan Bima Growth Fund (Growth)8.41%#14
22EDGE Al-Amin Shariah Consumer Fund (Balanced)8.40%too new
23Esquire ICL Apparel Fund (Growth)7.97%#19
24CWT Opportunities Fund (Growth)7.74%#16
25Shanta First Income Unit Fund (Growth)7.43%#26
26VIPB NLI 1st Unit Fund (Growth)6.79%#18
27IDLC AML Shariah Fund (Growth)6.56%#25
28VIPB SEBL 1st Unit Fund (Growth)6.41%#11
29LankaBangla Al-Arafah Shariah Unit Fund (Balanced)4.84%#23
30Shanta Amanah Shariah Fund (Growth)4.58%#27
31LB Gratuity Wealth Builder Fund (Balanced)4.44%#21
32ICL INCTL Shariah Fund (Balanced)4.18%too new
33UCB Taqwa Growth Fund (Growth)1.18%too new
34CWT Community Bank Shariah Fund (Growth)1.00%too new
35UCB AML First Mutual Fund (Balanced)0.34%#24

The last column is where the same fund ranks over 5 years, so a fund that only looks strong over the short window shows it at a glance. Tap a column heading to sort, or a type to filter.

VIPB Fixed Income Fund leads at 20.00% a year. The weakest managed 0.34% over the same months, with the same rules applied to both.

The longer view

27 funds have enough history for a 5 years window, and the order changes when you look at it.

Annualised total return over 5 years for the 27 funds with that much history. The last column is the same fund's rank over 2 years.
#FundPer year2-yr rank
1Shanta Fixed Income Fund (Income) Both8.53%#7
2Ekush Growth Fund (Growth) Both8.47%#6
3IDLC Income Fund (Income)7.67%#10
4CWT Emerging Bangladesh First Growth Fund (Growth)7.52%#19
5Ekush First Unit Fund (Balanced)6.47%#9
6IDLC Balanced Fund (Balanced)6.34%#11
7EDGE Bangladesh Mutual Fund (Growth) Both5.83%#4
8EDGE AMC Growth Fund (Growth) Both5.71%#5
9LB Gratuity Opportunities Fund (Balanced)5.51%#14
10VIPB Balanced Fund (Balanced)5.22%#16
11VIPB SEBL 1st Unit Fund (Growth)4.66%#28
12VIPB Growth Fund (Growth)4.20%#18
13VIPB Accelerated Income Unit Fund (Income)3.97%#20
14CWT Sadharan Bima Growth Fund (Growth)3.76%#21
15IDLC Growth Fund (Growth)3.37%#12
16CWT Opportunities Fund (Growth)3.37%#24
17BCB ICL Growth Fund (Growth)3.33%#13
18VIPB NLI 1st Unit Fund (Growth)3.15%#26
19Esquire ICL Apparel Fund (Growth)2.74%#23
20ICL Balanced Fund (Balanced)2.40%#17
21LB Gratuity Wealth Builder Fund (Balanced)1.83%#31
22LankaBangla 1st Balanced Unit Fund (Balanced)1.64%#15
23LankaBangla Al-Arafah Shariah Unit Fund (Balanced)0.90%#29
24UCB AML First Mutual Fund (Balanced)0.47%#35
25IDLC AML Shariah Fund (Growth)-0.14%#27
26Shanta First Income Unit Fund (Growth)-0.63%#25
27Shanta Amanah Shariah Fund (Growth)-1.69%#30

Over 5 years, Shanta Fixed Income Fund leads at 8.53% a year.

That reshuffle is the most useful thing on this page. A fund near the top of a short window may simply have caught a good stretch. A fund near the top of both windows has done it across more than one kind of market.

Funds sitting in the upper group on both: Shanta Fixed Income Fund, Ekush Growth Fund, EDGE Bangladesh Mutual Fund, EDGE AMC Growth Fund. That is 4 out of 35.

Shariah-compliant funds, ranked separately

Halal funds are screened out of interest-bearing income and several listed sectors, so ranking them against conventional funds compares two different investable universes. They get their own table.

Shariah-compliant funds over 2 years.
Shariah-compliant funds ranked by annualised total return over 2 years, through 24 September 2026.
#FundPer year
1EDGE Al-Amin Shariah Consumer Fund (Balanced)8.40%
2IDLC AML Shariah Fund (Growth)6.56%
3LankaBangla Al-Arafah Shariah Unit Fund (Balanced)4.84%
4Shanta Amanah Shariah Fund (Growth)4.58%
5ICL INCTL Shariah Fund (Balanced)4.18%
6UCB Taqwa Growth Fund (Growth)1.18%
7CWT Community Bank Shariah Fund (Growth)1.00%

EDGE Al-Amin Shariah Consumer Fund leads the 7 Shariah funds at 8.40% a year, with the weakest at 1.00%.

For context, that leading halal fund sits at number 22 of 35 on the combined table above. Whether that gap reflects the screening rules or simply which sectors did well over these particular months is covered in the post on Shariah fund returns.

What "best" is not

Best over a closed window is a fact. Best going forward is a guess, and this table cannot make it for you.

Two things it deliberately does not weigh. Risk, meaning how rough the ride was to get that number. And fund type, since an income fund and a growth fund are doing different jobs and a single ranking flattens that difference. The per-type breakdown and each fund's own page carry both.

Read this as a shortlist, not a verdict. Narrowing 35 funds down to a handful worth investigating properly is the job it does well.

How the numbers are built

Total return with cash dividends reinvested, computed from NAV history through 24 September 2026, using the same method for every fund. NAV prints come from the fund managers' own published figures wherever we can read them, validated against a second source before publication.

The fund's management fee is already inside the NAV. Tax, platform charges and buy or sell spreads are not modelled, so a real result would land slightly below what you see.

Common questions

How often does this ranking change?

The figures rebuild from NAV history every day, so the table reflects data through 24 September 2026. Positions can move whenever new NAV prints arrive.

Why do some funds appear in one table but not the other?

The longer table only includes funds with enough tracked history to fill that window. A fund missing from it is younger, not worse.

Does the top fund charge more?

Fees vary by fund and are set out in each prospectus. Because the management fee is deducted inside the NAV, the returns shown here are already after it.

Is a higher return always better?

Not on its own. A fund can reach a high figure by taking risks that would be uncomfortable to hold through. Look at the fund type, the holdings and the longer window before deciding.

Further reading on this site

Run these numbers on your own amount

Read next